How to solve the problem of Linux desktop

HeckI used to run a website named Desktop Linux. And I feel that, as Microsoft keeps moving Windows to a Desktop-as-a-Service model, Linux is going to be the last traditional PC desktop operating system status. But that does not mean I am blind to its own problems. In a recent TFiR meeting with Swapnil Bhartiya, Torvalds said,”Chromebooks and Android would be the path toward the background ” Since we do not have a standardized Linux desktop.
By way of instance, better Linux desktops, such as Linux Mint, offer a simple way to install applications, but beneath the surface, you will find half-a-dozen unique approaches to install apps. That makes life more difficult for developers. Torvalds wants”we had been better at having a standardized background that goes across the distributions”
Torvalds thinks there has been some progress. For software installation, he enjoys Flatpak. This software program, such as its rival Snap, lets you install and keep programs across various Linux distros. At the exact same time, this competition between Red Hat (which supports Flatpak) and Canonical (which backs Breeze ) bugs Torvalds. He is annoyed at the way the”fragmentation of the different sellers have held the desktop back.”
Not one of the significant Linux vendors — Canonical, Red Hat, SUSE — are really all that interested in behind the Linux desktop. They all have them, but they’re focused on servers, containers, the cloud, and the Internet of Things (IoT). That’s, after all, is where the real money is.
True, the broad strokes of the Linux background are painted primarily by Canonical and Red Hat, but the desktop is far from their best priority. Instead, much of the nuts and bolts of this current creation of the Linux desktop is defined by vendor-related communities: Red Hat, Fedora, SUSE’s openSUSE, and Canonical’s Ubuntu.
Another major player in setting the design of the Linux desktop are the bigger Linux communities. They’re all doing very good work, but they’re also running on a shoestring foundation.
Take Mint, my personal favorite desktop. Its lead programmer, Clement”Clem” Lefebvre, recently published:
“It’s not always easy to achieve what we desire, sometimes it is not even easy to specify what we want to realize. We could have doubtswe can work very hard on something for some time and then wonder it so much, we’re not even sure we’ll ship it. We could get demotivated, uncertain, depressed even by negative consequences or reactions, and it may lead to programmers stepping away from the undertaking, taking a break or even leaving for good.”
These aren’t the words of a happy person.
Lefebvre continued:
“It is about Muffin [Linux Mint’s default windows manager] at the moment. We’re trying to make it smoother, to create the windows feel lighter… radical changes and refactoring happened, it is eating a great deal of time and we’re chasing regressions left, right and center.
“I have a life outside open work work, too. It’s not emotionally sound to place the hours I have put to the compositor. I was just able to do exactly what I could because I had been jobless in January. Now I am working a project full time, and attempting to keep up with bug fixes. I’ve been spending every night and weekend, essentially every spare moment of my free time trying to fix things.
There’s also been tension because we are 1-2 months by a release. We have had contentious debate about input latency, effects of certain patches, and ways to measure all this. Other team members are moving through their own equally challenging circumstances, and it has an unfortunate quantity of stress to happen all at once in the wrong times. We are human in the end of the day. I wish these facets didn’t flow into the blog post so much, so just needed to vent and provide some context. If you take anything away from it, then please attempt the PPA and report bugs. We are in need of people searching for things that might get stuck in cinnamon 4.2.”